On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 13:18 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 1:14 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Of course, what might be really interesting would be an antiveto that
> > lowered AI by 1; AI<1 proposals could be interesting, as could making
> > proposals insufficiently powerful so they couldn't do what they were
> > meant to be able to do.
>
> If we wanted an imperial nomic, I don't think choosing the emperor
> with a randomly assigned prerogative available mostly to scamsters
> would be a good idea.
I don't see how that would allow a takeover (lower AI means lower
power); you'd have to fix wins with an AI-0 proposal, but apart from
that AI-0 proposals don't seem capable of much. It would, paradoxically,
probably be better for blocking proposals by reducing their AI so they
were unable to do what they wanted to do.
--
ais523
