On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 8:55 AM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 17:01 -0700, Quazie wrote: >> E actually violated a contract instead. ##nomic was a contract >> forbidding the eating of cake at the time (if i have my timing >> correct). > Actually, ##nomic still claims to be a public contract forbidding the > eating of cake, but it is obviously lying as it has never been > published. > -- > ais523 >
Does that mean we can make a criminal case against ##nomic? and, for that matter, why hasn't ##nomic registered yet?
