On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 17:01 -0700, Quazie wrote: > E actually violated a contract instead. ##nomic was a contract > forbidding the eating of cake at the time (if i have my timing > correct). Actually, ##nomic still claims to be a public contract forbidding the eating of cake, but it is obviously lying as it has never been published. -- ais523
- DIS: RE: BUS: Criminal cases Alexander Smith
- DIS: Re: BUS: CRIMINAL CASES Zefram
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CRIMINAL CASES Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CRIMINAL CASES Quazie
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CRIMINAL CASES Benjamin Schultz
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CRIMINAL CASES ais523
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CRIMINAL CASES Kerim Aydin
- DIS: Re: BUS: CRIMINAL CASES Zefram
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CRIMINAL CASES Quazie
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CRIMINAL CASES Elliott Hird
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CRIMINAL CASES ais523
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CRIMINAL CASES Quazie
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CRIMINAL CASES Ian Kelly
- DIS: Re: BUS: CRIMINAL CASES Ed Murphy
- DIS: Re: BUS: CRIMINAL CASES Ed Murphy
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CRIMINAL CASES comex
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CRIMINAL CASES Roger Hicks