On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jul 15, 2008, at 4:19 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > >> >> On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, Ian Kelly wrote: >>> >>> The statement is obviously not FALSE. >> >> Here's where it breaks down. If this is considered to be a poorly-labeled >> and communicated statement, it's not obvious. -Goethe > > I need to find a good place to drop into the rules the provision: > > The CotC CAN and SHOULD dismiss CFJs that are clearly dialatory.
I take offense. Mine is a serious case, intended to demonstrate that actions do indeed carry truth values. -root
