2008/7/15 Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > This makes something occur to me. Once an entity (a partnership) is > defined as a person, is it even possible, without violating R101, to make > them a non-person? At one stroke, by doing so, we've removed rights > that (the instant before the change takes effect) we're not permitted > to remove. It may be possible to change the rules so that no new > partnerships can be defined as persons (because non-existing partnerships > aren't persons yet) but can we get rid of the previous ones in any way? > > Similarly, can we amend R101 in a manner that reduces a current right? > (It's always possible to make a power-4 rule temporarily to allow it, > I'm talking about doing the reduction through a straightforward > amendment).
The problem is that partnerships aren't people. We need 'doers', which are like people+partnerships. And most occurences of 'person' replaced with 'doer' in the rules, and players be a subset of doers. tusho
