On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sat, 12 Jul 2008, Ed Murphy wrote: >> a) An attempted speech act is equivalent to a claim that the >> person will perform the action by sending the message. > > Why on earth are we codifying this? For years, we have not punished > folks for merely failing to perform an action. The new interpretation > seems to say we do now. This is Wrong, Chilling, etc., and should > be fixed if the rules support it. Or am I misreading this clause > entirely? Do I really have to include a disclaimer in every action? > That's very Un-Agoran. -Goethe
People will need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you did not believe the action would be successful if you don't include a disclaimer. I don't think that's chilling really. -woggle
