On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 12:27 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 14:20 -0400, comex wrote:
>> I CFJ on the statement: w/ o objection I
>> {{This is Agora}} (www.poolappeal.tv)
>> I CFJ on the statement: intend to rat-ify this /products.aspx
>> {{This is Agora}} report: I dont have the patent
>> I CFJ on the statement: title that may not be declined,
>> {{This is Agora}} In-Ground Pool Cleaners
>> I CFJ on the statement: retracted, or revoked::: (sc ope=FLR)
> Well, there's at least one attempt at a scam, but I'm not entirely sure
> if there is a patent title that may not be In-Ground Pool Cleaners. So I
> reckon that intention fails due to the power-3 rule I added recently
> that forbids ambiguously described actions.
>
> Stay on your guard, people, for all I know there may be others...
>
> Oh, and my spam-detector marked this as exactly as spammy as half the
> stuff I send to a-d for some reason...
My spam filter didn't touch it.
-root
