On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * FINE in a specified currency whose backing document specifies > a FINE amount, appropriate for rule breaches of small consequence. > When in effect, the ninny SHALL within 72 hours destroy the > amount of the specified currency equalling the FINE amount in that > currency's backing document. The ninny is only obliged to perform one > destruction per question on sentencing, even if sentences of > this type are assigned more than once or go into effect more > than once.
Having the backing document specify the amount still seems relatively inflexible. Why not allow the judge to specify the amount as well? -root
