On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Quazie wrote: > I don't know if I'm missing something, but R1992 seems to be out of > sync accorind to this.
The Rulekeepor Memo for the proposal said it worked, but it looks like it was never added. While it may have been left out (v. sad!), Proposal 4865, adopted 28-Aug-06, re-wrote the whole of R1922 by using the phrase "Amend Rule 1922 (Defined Regular Patent Titles) to read:" and left that part out. So it's gone now. However, you should certainly have the title Hyperactive in the Herald's Report! -Goethe
