On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I submit the following on behalf of BobTHJ with respect to eir obligations
> on CFJ 2020, as authorized by the Vote Market Contract.  -Goethe
>
> In many worlds, perhaps in an ideal one, I would have handled the matter of
> CFJ 2005 quite differently.  My objective was humor, however in using the
> judicial system for said humor, I saw my objective collapse quite quickly.
> It has been done in the past, perhaps not commonly, but it has been done
> in the past, to include a pledge as part of an apology, for example a
> specific promise not to do something again.  In this case, I pledge to
> deregister within 24 hours as a sign of remorse and mea culpa, or to owe
> (or lets choose someone at random) 30VP to Goethe, and this is a legal
> pledge as part of an apology I am authorized to make because of course
> an apology is not limited or proscribed in content!  Just kidding...I do
> not in the context of this apology as a whole make any pledge, this was
> merely an example of using the judicial system for the purposes of humor,
> in this case used in a way to give myself, I mean BobTHJ, a momentary worry
> that I might be obligated by my own apology in a not-so-nice way.  Sorry for
> that, self!  You certainly wouldn't get away with that in Copenhagen.  Ahem.
> As I was saying, I am full of remorse at making such a silly judicial error.
> "Sorry Alice!" from, Bob!  Hmm, I, Bob, must have some reason for mentioning
> Alice?  Just came to me.  Something I was supposed to say?  Was it something
> in the middle of?  Some piece of quantum cryptography?  Can't think of it.
> Well, if I was in the middle of something like, rest assured that it wouldn't
> change my remorseful apology one bit.     -BobTHJ
>

I couldn't have said it better!...though you had me scared there for a moment :)

BobTHJ

Reply via email to