On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is just a rough proto so far. The idea is to prevent scams that > involve repeating the same set of actions over and over again within a > short period of time. > > A game action is liberal iff the rules explicitly indicate that it is. > A game action that is not liberal is parsimonious. > > The following game actions are liberal: > > * Casting or retracting votes on Agoran decisions. > > * Submitting proposals. > > * Assigning a judgement to a judicial case. > > * Any action that is required or permitted as a direct result of > holding an office. To preserve R101 rights: * Submitting a non-excess CFJ. * Initiating an appeal. * Deregistering. You should also let contracts make their contract-defined actions be liberal if they choose (or maybe have fractional "cost" if the contract so chooses?) and let transferring/destroying/etc. assets be liberal if the asset's backing document so chooses. -woggle
