On Tuesday 24 June 2008 7:40:01 Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Ben Caplan
> > Define "game action". Does this include contract-defined actions?
> That's the intent.  Perhaps s/game action/regulated action/
This still isn't clear to me. It determines unambiguously whether a
given statement contains zero or nonzero game actions, but not how
finely actions should be divided. I would actually much rather have
an explicit list of parsimonious actions.

Here's another example case: If I deposit 4 4 crops to the [R]BoA, is
that one action or four? If the deposit rate is 25, does that mean the
Bank takes 100 actions?


> > Here's an alternate form, which should prevent scams while also
> > allowing more activity:
> > Parsimonious actions *cost* 1 persimmon each.
> In the interests of accurate recordkeeping, it should still be
> possible to perform parsimonious actions with no persimmons, just
> illegal.  Also, extra persimmons wouldn't be worth much in this model.
"Whenever a person performs a parsimonious action, if e owns any
persimmons, one persimmon that e owns is destroyed. A person SHALL NOT
perform a parsimonious action if e owns no persimmons. A person SHALL
NOT transfer all eir persimmons."

> > If no active first-class
> > player has 5 or more persimmons, any player CAN by announcement as a
> > liberal action create one persimmon in the possession of each active
> > first-class player.
> I doubt that this condition would ever arise in practice, and the
> effort needed to check it would be hideous.
It would arise all the time if persimmons were spent as I'm suggesting,
and I don't see that the effort involved would be significantly more
than that arising from your version.
However, for the simplicity of recordkeeping:
"Any player CAN by announcement as a liberal action create one
persimmon in the possession of each active first-class player. If any
active first-class player possesses five or more persimmons, then this
action is FORBIDDEN and is not a liberal action, the previous sentence
notwithstanding."

Pavitra

Reply via email to