On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Ian Kelly wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 2:08 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> Unfortunately, I am very unlikely to get 27 Vote Points (ever). But I >>>> am not unwilling to give back what I robbed, just not for free. How >>>> about this: >>>> - once the Bank of Agora, or RBoA (whichever one) is stable and patched, >>>> - and Murphy has given back to the AFO the assets that e recently >>>> transferred to emself, >>>> - I will give back all of the assets that I stole to the BoA/RBoA, >>>> - except for what Goethe's judgement envisioned giving me as "a >>>> payment for the demonstration", as follows: >>>> >>>> 2 0 crops. >>>> 2 4 crops. >>>> 1 5 crop. >>>> 2 8 crops. >>>> 1 9 crop. >>>> 5 vote points. >>>> >>> I am willing to agree to this out-of-court settlement. >> >> Me too. > > If comex and at least one (former) Bank member formally agree to this > as a contract, I'll call its existence the full equitable settlement in > judgement (not all members need to agree for that to happen, though it > would be friendly :) ). > Since Murphy (as an AFO member) plays a significant role in this settlement, and since the AFO is the only remaining banker (excluding those who were recently removed from bankership) who hasn't consented to this settlement, I think we need to hear from em.
BobTHJ
