On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Quazie wrote:
>
>> If a contract included a provision that a member may lie in relation
>> to the contract without penalty, would a lie in relation to that
>> contract violate R 2149?
>
> Strong game custom holds that rules take precedence over non-rules.

Equally strong custom holds that this is not true for matters irrelevant to 
the Rules.  Intermediate items (items wholly governed by contracts, which
are themselves governed by the rules: there lies gray area).  Test:  Will we 
need to prosecute every Werewolf for lying?

-Goethe



Reply via email to