On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now, that I look more closely, that part of Rule 1586 is broken > anyhow. It says "Two Rule-defined entities CANNOT have the same name > or nickname" where "CANNOT" means "Attempts to perform the described > action are unsuccessful."
In other words, if two Rule-defined entities attempt to have the same name or nickname, the attempt is unsuccessful. Technically "probably broken", but I'm sure there's strong precedent that it works properly. --Ivan Hope CXXVII
