On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 3:07 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually, since Rule 1586 is only Power=2, this won't break anything > if adopted. It will, however, create a conflict between Rule 106 and > Rule 1586.
Now, that I look more closely, that part of Rule 1586 is broken anyhow. It says "Two Rule-defined entities CANNOT have the same name or nickname" where "CANNOT" means "Attempts to perform the described action are unsuccessful." -root
