On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > CFJ 1951 is for the same act as CFJ 1948 (citing a different rule), and > therefore becomes ALREADY JUDGED.
I think you mean ALREADY TRIED. But note that while it may be reasonable here, it's not appropriate because ALREADY TRIED requires that it be the same rule allegedly broken. -root
