On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > my gnarlierness depends on the interpretation of the rules (for > instance, if there were a rule "Whenever an exiled entity is ever > not a player, e is registered", it would cause the same sort of > trigger loop as this one, and interpretation of those rules would > determine whether the entity in question were a party.
But there isn't such a rule, and the whole point of awarding wins by paradox is (or should be, anyway) about paradoxes that are actually in the rules. Your ability to create a paradoxical contract without the support of a majority of players which makes information required to judge a case logically impossible for the judge to ascertain isn't the same as an ability to trick the other players into voting for a series of rules changes that create a paradox.
