On Thu, 15 May 2008, Ed Murphy wrote: > For example, if the Rules are changed so that CFJs are still defined > but there is no way of initiating them, can I invoke R101 (iii.) to > initiate a CFJ by announcement?
A while ago, I CFJ'd that I should be able to CFJ due to R101(iii), when some other aspect of the judicial system prevented me at the time. Judge Maud (I think Maud) found that false... can't locate the CFJ from a scan, anyone have better eyes or memory? Or am I just making this all up? -Goethe
