ehird wrote: > Rule 2140(c) implies that no entity with a power less than 3 can > modify any substantive aspect of an instrument with power greater than > its own, defining a "substantive" aspect of an instrument as any > aspect that affects the instrument's operation. Therefore, in order to Hmm... wouldn't this line of reasoning stop the anarchy scam from working? More to the point, wouldn't it imply that the town fountain never ended up there in the first place? -- ais523
<<winmail.dat>>
