On Sat, 10 May 2008, Ben Caplan wrote: > On Saturday 10 May 2008 12:24:14 Kerim Aydin wrote: >> R2125 states that actions are regulated >> if (conditions a..d), but does not define "regulated", nor does any other >> Rule. > > I always thought that R2125 defined "regulated". In what sense does it > not do so, and what is it doing instead?
R2125 says "If Actions are a,b,c,d, then they are Regulated." But that doesn't say what being regulated actually means, at least not by explicit definition. (E.g. it doesn't go on to say "something that is regulated can't be done except as allowed"). So then I go on to say that well, Regulated, in common language, means "someething that can't be done except as allowed." -Goethe
