On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If a rule states that an action is regulated, that does not > prevent that action from taking place, but only prevents that > thing from taking place under rule 101(ii) (and therefore makes > it impossible to take that action unless another rule makes it > possible).
As worded, this seems trivially TRUE; for it to be otherwise it would always be impossible to perform any regulated action, including those that made regulated by 2125(b) explicitly because they're allowed.
