There only seems to be one relevant use of "reasonably"; are you implying that you interpret "reasonably equitable" as "reasonable and equitable"? I don't, and I don't think it's standard English usage to. I can't find anywhere in the ruleset where it says judgements must be reasonable, could you point me to where specifically?
-- ais523 -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Geoffrey Spear Sent: Wed 07/05/2008 21:09 To: agora-discussion@agoranomic.org Subject: Re: DIS: RE: punish the scamster, too On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It was an equitable resolution of the situation; all parties agreeing > to the equation, having thought of it themselves, is one of the most > equitable outcomes I can think of. There are other possible equitable > reslutions too, most of which are a lot simpler than the equation I > gave, but the fact that my equation is unneccesarily complex doesn't > prevent it being equitable. Note the use of the word "reasonably" in the rule. If an equation that grants the person violating a contract the power to grant points to the judge in the case is found to be "reasonable", I'll start drafting my Canteus Cygneus now.
<<winmail.dat>>
