On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I initiate a criminal CFJ with ais523 as the defendant, alleging a > violation of Rule 2158 by assigning an inappropriate judgement to CFJ > 1932. Eir judgment in this case is not "a reasonably equitable > resolution of the situation at hand with respect to the matters raised > in the initiation of the case", rule 2169's criteria for > appropriateness; in fact eir judgment was made entirely to promote a > scam from which e immediately tried to benefit, an egregious abuse of > the judicial system.
How is it not a reasonably equitable resolution of the situation? The only party to the contract in question considers it to be equitable. -root
