On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While this addresses the original issue with the Vote Market > agreement, it does not remedy or address the breach of CFJ 1915's > equation. I will leave it for someone else to determine if that is a > problem.
Well, my substantially similar proto was around for almost a whole week with no comment from any parties to the original equation on its substance (although Goethe, a party, did comment extensively on legal issues behind the original solution), and there was no comment from the parties during the pre-trial phase either. If this is appealed, I humbly beg the panel to judge REASSIGN.
