On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 8:44 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In CFJ 1927, my judgment is the following Equation: > > 1. Each first-class party to this equation (the first-class members of > the CFJ 1915 equation at the time CFJ 1927 was called), with the > exception of comex, CAN, during the 30 days following this equation > becoming binding, specify one Agoran Decision with two or more days > remaining before its resolution and one valid vote on that decision by > announcement. > 2. Comex SHALL cast one valid vote on each Agoran Decision specified > in #1 matching the vote requested by the party specifying that > Decision. This vote must remain validly cast until the Agoran > Decision has been resolved. If more votes on a particular Decision > are specified than comex can cast on that Decision, then e MAY choose > which of the specified votes e SHALL cast and e is released from eir > obligation to satisfy the excess requests for that Decision. > 3. After this equation has been binding for 30 days or after all > eligible parties have specified Agoran Decisions on which comex shall > vote, IF AND ONLY IF Comex has fulfilled all eir obligations in #2, > the parties to this equation SHALL take such actions necessary to > modify the Vote Market agreement such that comex can leave the > agreement without incurring further obligations. > > --Wooble >
While this addresses the original issue with the Vote Market agreement, it does not remedy or address the breach of CFJ 1915's equation. I will leave it for someone else to determine if that is a problem. BobTHJ
