On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 21 Apr 2008, Ben Caplan wrote: > > A contract need only be "made by" persons. Once the contract is > > created, there is no reason why a nonperson might not be a party. In > > this case it is only necessary that an entity be able to continue > > being a party upon losing personhood, but it seems to me that it might > > even be possible, in principle, for a nonperson to *become* a party. > > Not so long as R101 requires "informed consent". (Constructing a non- > person whose "consent" we would consider to be "informed" is left as an > exercise).
A question... Can first-class persons who are not players make, enter, or be bound by contracts governed by the Agora Nomic ruleset? > > -Goethe > > >
