On Mon, 21 Apr 2008, Ben Caplan wrote: > A contract need only be "made by" persons. Once the contract is > created, there is no reason why a nonperson might not be a party. In > this case it is only necessary that an entity be able to continue > being a party upon losing personhood, but it seems to me that it might > even be possible, in principle, for a nonperson to *become* a party.
Not so long as R101 requires "informed consent". (Constructing a non- person whose "consent" we would consider to be "informed" is left as an exercise). -Goethe
