pikhq, I'm the caller of your CFJ, not the judge.
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 3 Apr 2008, Josiah Worcester wrote:
> > On 11:55 Thu 03 Apr , Iammars wrote:
> >> I judge CFJ 1917 in the following manner:
> >> {
> >> The defendant has admitted to being guilty, and in fact has not
> published a
> >> notary report last month, so I judge GUILTY.
> >> }
> >>
> >> I sentence em in the folowing manner:
> >> {
> >> This offense is not a major offense, but ignoring an office's report,
> >> especially one as important as Notary, shouldn't be left unpunished. I
> >> sentence APOLOGY, perscribing the words "report," "keyboard,"
> "printer,"
> >> "amoeba," "outlet," and "llama."
> >> }
> >
> > In my report, the printer's keyboard went all amoeba. The outlet, in
> > response, turned into a llama. The llama ate my records, and left me
> > incapable of speaking comprehensibly.
>
> Thanks, but I think I'm the guilty party on this one...
>
>
>
>
>
--
-----Iammars
www.jmcteague.com
