On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Ed Murphy >  I create 2 beads in my possession.
>  I call for judgement on the following statements:
>
>   * Murphy has a bead.
>   * pikhq has a bead.
I suggest that each contract defined a novel type of asset called a
"bean", and that the rest of the message is therefore ambiguous as to
what kind of bean is being referred to (including the CFJ, which
should be judged UNDETERMINED on that ground).

Reply via email to