On 19:49 Wed 02 Apr , Ed Murphy wrote: > pikhq wrote: > > > I disqualify Agora Nomic from this case. > > > > (Agora Nomic, by rule 2145, is a partnership, and therefore a > > person. I can disqualify any person I damned well want to. Have fun > > judging this one!) > > This fails on multiple points: > > * Rule 2171 (Rules Viewed as Binding Agreement) was repealed by > Proposal 5469 last week, so Agora's status as an agreement is > subject to natural-language interpretation.
Whoever supported that should be lynched, thank you. > * Agora does not devolve its legal obligations onto players, so it > isn't a partnership. *looks through the rules* Hrm. Right there. > * Agora is not a public contract, so even if it were a partnership, > it wouldn't be a person. It seems absurd that every agreement discussed in the public forum is a public contract except for the entity defining contracts. XD > * Disqualifying a partnership does not disqualify the members of > its basis. Hrm. Pity. Oh, the scam potential you could have with that. . .
