pikhq wrote: > I disqualify Agora Nomic from this case. > > (Agora Nomic, by rule 2145, is a partnership, and therefore a > person. I can disqualify any person I damned well want to. Have fun > judging this one!)
This fails on multiple points: * Rule 2171 (Rules Viewed as Binding Agreement) was repealed by Proposal 5469 last week, so Agora's status as an agreement is subject to natural-language interpretation. * Agora does not devolve its legal obligations onto players, so it isn't a partnership. * Agora is not a public contract, so even if it were a partnership, it wouldn't be a person. * Disqualifying a partnership does not disqualify the members of its basis.