On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 11:31 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The rule in question says "a specified time in the future". Another > part of that rule explicitly equates "I perform X <positive integer> > times" as equivalent to that many instances of "I perform X", so "I > perform X at each of <finite set of times>" would probably fly on > similar grounds.
Looking at B Nomic Rule 4E7, I also see nothing stopping one from basing either the scheduled time or the number of repetitions on a specific quantity that is impractical to compute (e.g. "the private key corresponding to public key X")... -root
