On 02/04/2008, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/30/08, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, I'm sure overnight is long enough for anybody. Hopefully there's > > nothing wrong with this. > > Why a contract?
So it can define currencies and impose obligations and such things without having to make a new contract, I guess: if a face is a contract, the ruleset can perform changes on it, while if it's not, the ruleset has to make changes to it so as to allow someone else to create a contract. No big difference, really. --Ivan Hope CXXVII
