Ed Murphy wrote: >============================== CFJ 1897 ============================== ... >Judge: BobTHJ >Judgement: FALSE > >Appeal: 1897a >Decision: OVERRULE ... >OVERRULED on Appeal: 19 Mar 2008 13:52:20 GMT
I note that nowhere in this case file do you state what the current judgement actually is. This seems like a serious failing, in a document that is meant to be referred to for historical purposes. For that matter, your case file for CFJ 1897a doesn't formally specify the "to TRUE" part of the judgement, leaving it to be extracted from the panellists' arguments. -zefram
