On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Roger Hicks wrote: >> Oh can you stop with the craptastic repeat? This has been done. >> > It has? my apologies.
CFJ 1594 assignment, leading to Murphy's win by paradox as detailed in Caller's arguments and Evidence in CFJ 1597. But my apologies too: it was a little over year ago so I misremembered you came on board while it was still going on, and the CFJ record isn't entirely clear. But what made the earlier one work is that the argument for FALSE was "reasonable" rather than nonexistent and against a specific precedent as in your case, so on its face there was no reason for the appeals board to overturn it. If you'd wanted to do this scam, you should have come up with reasonable arguments! -Goethe
