On 26/02/2008, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I judge FALSE. > > I intend to appeal this with two support. It contradicts without > argument the precedents set down in CFJs 1895 and 1899.
I support this. --Ivan Hope CXXVII
