"Reform" refers to 1 Aug 2007, the approximate time when Zefram's judicial reform proposal was adopted (changing initiation of appeal from "automatically on third call for appeal" to "with 2 support", and resolution from "automatically on third appeal judge's decision" to "upon panel action").
Appeal Opened Closed 1684a Pre-reform As block 1711a As block Tue 9 Oct 00:47:11 1711b Sun 21 Oct 17:33:22 Mon 22 Oct 19:54:16 1714a TBA TBA 1740a TBA TBA 1745a TBA TBA 1748a TBA TBA 1777a TBA TBA 1786a TBA TBA 1787a TBA TBA 1799a TBA TBA 1805a TBA TBA 1806a TBA TBA 1807a TBA TBA 1812a TBA TBA 1828a TBA TBA 1830a TBA TBA 1831a TBA TBA 1831b TBA TBA 1836a TBA TBA 1836b TBA TBA 1837a TBA TBA 1838a TBA TBA 1840a TBA TBA 1846a TBA TBA 1849a TBA TBA 1857a TBA TBA 1858a TBA TBA 1860a TBA TBA 1863a TBA TBA 1870a TBA TBA 1879a Already OK Not closed yet 1882a Tue 29 Jan 22:38:05 Wed 30 Jan 23:00:31 1896a Already OK Already OK "As block" means that individual actions (intent to initiate appeal, support for initiating appeal, intent to cause panel to act, consent for causing panel to act) have the same timestamp as the collective action (which is thus correct). For later events, individual actions are timestamped when they occurred. For all post-reform events, individual actions not leading to a collective action are omitted. For all panel recusals, only the members of the old panel that were not members of the new panel are recorded as being recused, and only the members of the new panel that were not members of the old panel are recorded as being assigned. On 1711a, IIRC comex and pikhq were ineffectively assigned (due to comex being supine), then consented, then were effectively assigned, so the order of events will end up looking weird even after things are fixed (because the ineffective assignment will remain omitted).
