comex wrote: >Furthermore, Rule 2160 notes >> (or, if the position is vacant, would so require if the position were filled) > >Makes sense for offices, and maybe other things (vote collector?) but >is absolutely meaningless if a person is a position.
It's not meaningless. It's obviously not relevant to persons as positions, but a person being a position does not damage its meaningfulness and its relevance to offices. >Finally, 'position' *is* used elsewhere in the rules, but only in a >rule about offices: Clearly an office is a type of position. But "position" is a very broad term, and can encompass all sorts of things, some but not all of which can be vacant. -zefram
