On Feb 1, 2008 7:38 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I submit the following Proposal, entitled "Don't sue, just deputize"
> and set it's AI to 1.7:
> {{
> Repeal Rule 2169.
>
> In Rule 1871, remove the text:
> , and poorly qualified to be assigned
> as judge of any equity case
>
> In Rule 2173, remove the text:
> The Notary SHALL
> disclose this information (to the extent that e has been
> informed of it) to the judge of an equity case pertaining to
> that contract.
>
> In Rule 2191, remove the text:
> An equity case regarding a pledge CAN be initiated by a
> non-party, provided that all other requirements for initiating
> an equity case are met. The initiator of such a case is
> considered to be a party to the pledge for the purpose of that
> case.
> }}
Repealing equity cases would remove the ability to pursue equity in
the broader sense. Equity cases cover general inequities in the
proceedings of contracts, not just the particular cases where some
party has failed to meet eir obligations. Even in those cases,
deputisation can't always correct everything. For example, a party
who fails to vote in the manner e's required to; by the time
deputisation is an option, the voting period will likely have ended.
-root
