On Sat, 2 Feb 2008, Zefram wrote: >> As for H. Appeleate Panelist Goethe's arguments, I do not believe that R101's >> requirement of consent applies to becoming bound by the rules. > > Good analysis in this paragraph.
Except that it completely ignores the existence of R2171. Not that it's strong enough to change the agreement, but R2171 should be noted and considered. Otherwise, no quibbles, the judgement overall is consistent with CFJ 1290 and game custom. Good analysis. -Goethe
