Charles Reiss wrote: [misdirected AC proposals] >Was there a CFJ for this?
No. It wasn't controversial. > I do not think things outside the rules >should influence the rules' interpretation of messages when a perfectly valid >interpretation exists entirely inside the rules -- and certainly not when the >rules explicitly define this interpretation. The rules do not explicitly define the meaning of "registered as a watcher". I wonder how "I wish to be registered as a carpenter." would be interpreted. -zefram
