On Wednesday 30 January 2008 17:43:08 Levi Stephen wrote: > I agree to REMAND also. > > Is it also worth considering the possibility that the registration > notice registered a player 'Pavitra', rather than 'watcher'? (I believe > this was the initial interpretation from the registrar?)
I believe that to be the better interpretation of the message, but there's no reason why a player can't have two (or more) nicknames by which they can be referred to (see also CFJ 1361). -woggle
