On Jan 24, 2008 10:10 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As pikhq notes, contracts are binding. So one might interpret your > change to the contract to make it non-binding as an act of > dissolution. Nonsense. They merely have to be made "with the intention that [they] be binding". There's no reason they can't be "modified" later to no longer be so.
- DIS: Re: BUS: Contract comex
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Contract Ian Kelly
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Contract comex
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Contract Josiah Worcester
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Contract comex
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Contract Josiah Worcester
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Contract comex
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Contract Josiah Worcester