On Jan 11, 2008 7:13 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why would automatic assignment be too difficult? Posture and activity
> changes can easily be tracked manually, and if an occasional invalid
> judge were to be assigned due to the manual changes not being updated
> the judge assignment would still stand, no?

Assigning a poorly qualified judge (e.g. a sitting or leaning player
as a judge) would expose the CotC to criminal liability (breaking rule
1868) and would be easy for a player to cause deliberately given an
automated system.

(Assigning unqualified judges is IMPOSSIBLE, so it would just be
confusing until an effective assignment was made.)

-woggle

Reply via email to