On Jan 11, 2008 5:04 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > comex wrote: > > > This is a non-issue as far as I can see. If a player submits a CFJ > > through a web interface, it doesn't actually exist in the gamestate > > until the submission is posted on a public forum. So the interface > > would in any case email business on eir behalf (CFJ 1719). That's > > just to submit the CFJ; once assigned, you'd see another message on > > official. If the server hosting it suddenly exploded, the CotC > > presumably can still manage CFJs emself. > > I might be able to rig my server to send emails through my account > (given a prior agreement that Agora would treat them as sent by the > actual submitter), but yeah, (1) automating assignment is too > difficult and (2) it'd be kind of pointless without that. > Why would automatic assignment be too difficult? Posture and activity changes can easily be tracked manually, and if an occasional invalid judge were to be assigned due to the manual changes not being updated the judge assignment would still stand, no?
BobTHJ
