On Jan 10, 2008 4:19 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Unless CFJ 1859 is appealed and overturned. I suspect it won't be, > but I've been maintaining an unofficial Mark record just in case.
By the way, the web archive shows that I initiated CFJ 1859; it was actually comex. Zefram's case file appears to be correct, however. -root
