On Thursday 10 January 2008 16:27:31 Ian Kelly wrote: > On Jan 10, 2008 4:23 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That doesn't matter. A PROPOSAL AWARDED THE PATENT TITLE. > > If CFJ 1859 is overturned, then the adoption of the proposal in > question has not been correctly announced and so has not yet taken > effect. Additionally, it would not have self-ratified due to the CFJ. > > -root
Ah.
