On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, comex wrote: > On Jan 7, 2008 4:41 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> judgement > You have not taken into account CFJs 1833-5, which basically confirm > the arguments from CFJ 1719 that you find erroneous.
No, that constitutes the same judge reiterating eir own arguments which may have been based on a false premise. This is not "confirmation". -Goethe
