On Monday 07 January 2008 17:38:39 Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
> > Deb & Bob were a player in 1993, which (I believe) predates
> > executorship by about 2 years and power of attorney by about 5 years.
>
> Which means it's less relevant to the present day.  We've had a period
> where they were not regulated (apparently, I don't know the rules from
> back then), and a period where they were strongly regulated.  The
> current climate may inherent from either period.
>
> > Partnerships don't have formal executors, but nobody seems to be
> > disputing that they function without them.
>
> I dispute that.  Requiring partnerships to explicitly devolve requirements
> to act (R2145) formalizes the executorship to some extent.
>
> > CFJ 1303 doesn't seem relevant to me, as it is concerned with the senders
> > of messages rather than the effectiveness of actions.
>
> Fair enough.
>
> > Rule 2160 provides a way for players to act in place of offices, not
> > persons.
>
> The fact that it exists implies that without it, a person cannot act for
> another person who happens to be an officer.  I realize this is an indirect
> implication.
>
> The question is, in the absence of explicit regulation, does a "right"
> exist for you to sign away all your rights of refusal to act exist, or is
> it better for the game to refuse to recognize such a sign-away as binding
> (many bodies of law do not recognize signing yourself into slavery, for
> example).
>
> I also note that standards may differ for a long-time player who publicly
> signed away eir rights (e.g. Peekee) versus someone who has never posted
> and it is not clear that they "understand" what they have signed away.
> Which is why I've requested some direct evidence from Steve Wallace.
>
> -Goethe

My apologies. Steve Wallace has heard me discussing Agora for quite a while, 
so he was quite willing to agree to this bit of toying with the rules (and 
aware of the implications). I shall ask him to send a message to you as soon 
as he is available (he seems to be in transit at the moment).

Reply via email to